Maarten
08-03-2004, 08:02 PM
Started in another topic:
Debaser wrote:
Not sure what your concept of transcription is, but it appears that you have confused transcribing and improvising - they are entirely separate skills. Developing good improvisational skill entails being able to translate your thought process to your fingers instantly. However, that doesn't mean that a player has an idea in his/her head and then plays it on the instrument - it's a much more immediate process than that, with everything sort of happening at once(at least in my experience).
Maarten wrote:
wouldn't agree with that. In order to improvise coherently I have to think ahead, to avoid turning on the autopilot and just play on muscle memory. When I'm in good condition I can keep thinking measures ahead of what I'm playing.
Debaser wrote:
That's interesting to me, because I've never approached it like that. I might think about it(my approach to a solo) ahead of time, and as I'm playing I may have a general feeling of the aesthetic affect that I'm aiming for, but as for the actual melodic content, it's all realized in the moment. I know it's a little off topic, but I'd be curious to know what other people think about this. I'll think about it when I'm playing with the band tonight, as well.
Maarten wrote:
I realised that this way of thinking when improvising is really important during one of my guitar lessons this year, and it has been a major breathrough point for me. It's not easy, but when I'm able to pull it of it's just like I fast forward a recording a couple of seconds (without changing pitch ofcourse) and then think of something I'm gonna play. If I don't do that, I end up playing endless melodies because I didn't think of a whole sentence and thus don't know on which note to stop. The point is that you think of larger musical phrases than you can think of when playing directly what you come up with. The amount of time you think ahead is changing all the time, and also the matter of detail. Sometimes can hear the whole phrase exactly, sometimes only the final note, and the contour of the line.
In the end it's all about imagination, and why I encourage people to train their aural imagination and listen to a lot of stuff, as opposed to approaching everything on a theoretical basis. Improvising is thinking of something to play, and then being able to play it. If you can't play over an altered dominant, it's because you can't come up with melodies that fit over it, not per se because you don't know what scale to use. You can sing happy birthday without knowing that it's built with on a major scale.
Debaser wrote:
Not sure what your concept of transcription is, but it appears that you have confused transcribing and improvising - they are entirely separate skills. Developing good improvisational skill entails being able to translate your thought process to your fingers instantly. However, that doesn't mean that a player has an idea in his/her head and then plays it on the instrument - it's a much more immediate process than that, with everything sort of happening at once(at least in my experience).
Maarten wrote:
wouldn't agree with that. In order to improvise coherently I have to think ahead, to avoid turning on the autopilot and just play on muscle memory. When I'm in good condition I can keep thinking measures ahead of what I'm playing.
Debaser wrote:
That's interesting to me, because I've never approached it like that. I might think about it(my approach to a solo) ahead of time, and as I'm playing I may have a general feeling of the aesthetic affect that I'm aiming for, but as for the actual melodic content, it's all realized in the moment. I know it's a little off topic, but I'd be curious to know what other people think about this. I'll think about it when I'm playing with the band tonight, as well.
Maarten wrote:
I realised that this way of thinking when improvising is really important during one of my guitar lessons this year, and it has been a major breathrough point for me. It's not easy, but when I'm able to pull it of it's just like I fast forward a recording a couple of seconds (without changing pitch ofcourse) and then think of something I'm gonna play. If I don't do that, I end up playing endless melodies because I didn't think of a whole sentence and thus don't know on which note to stop. The point is that you think of larger musical phrases than you can think of when playing directly what you come up with. The amount of time you think ahead is changing all the time, and also the matter of detail. Sometimes can hear the whole phrase exactly, sometimes only the final note, and the contour of the line.
In the end it's all about imagination, and why I encourage people to train their aural imagination and listen to a lot of stuff, as opposed to approaching everything on a theoretical basis. Improvising is thinking of something to play, and then being able to play it. If you can't play over an altered dominant, it's because you can't come up with melodies that fit over it, not per se because you don't know what scale to use. You can sing happy birthday without knowing that it's built with on a major scale.